Sunday, July 10, 2011

A grueling two weeks.

The Quakes are coming off a punishing schedule of four MLS games in two weeks with a friendly game against English Premier League team West Bromwich Albion coming up on Tuesday.  With a record of no wins, one loss and three ties it feels like a torrid time for the fans who want points and a playoff spot in the bag as early as possible. The Quakes have 22 points from 18 games - still in touch for a playoff spot, but with half the season played the fans are starting to get nervous.

All may not be lost - let’s review the Quakes' opposition during that time frame:
  • LA Galaxy (39 points from 21 games): A 0-0 tie against the conference leaders that was mostly memorable for not getting any shots on goal that were challenging for a midget goalie in an oversized shirt – and he was a position player too.  Bruce Arena packed the LA defense tighter than Imodium – the failure to score left Quakes fans embarrassed, further compounded by the presence of Galaxative fans, who did not shirk their responsibility to rub salt in our wounds. 
  • New York Red Bulls (28 points from 20 games). This was the ‘big’ game of the year in front of 41 thousand fans at Stanford stadium, most of whom were wearing Quakes gear.  The closely fought match, that finished 2-2, had a level of excitement not seen before at a Quakes 2.0 home game.  The as highlight of this game is that it proved to the organization that the fan base is there – more than enough fans to fill the proposed new stadium three times over. If you build it we will come, and it will be a tough ticket.
  • Chivas USA (22 points from 19 games):  The only team salary lower than San Jose is Chivas, so yes, it’s ironic that we lost that one.  It was a truly forgettable midweek matchup that the Quakes lost 0-2 – Twitter feeds during the game used terms such as dull, mundane, tedium, lackluster, sleepwalk and ennui (my favorite, and a first for one  of my feeds I believe). 
  • Philadelphia Union (28 points from 18 games):  The Union is hot on the heels of NYRB and they have two games in hand.  The Union team is challenging for the lead in their conference in only the second season in MLS; the club has great fans and one of the better stadiums in MLS (yes, more stadium envy).  The game was a scoreless tie, marred by another moronic referee who appeared to thrive on being the center of attention, rather than letting the play be the focus of the fans.   
So, if I asked myself at the beginning of this season: "would I be happy with ties against the top two teams in the Eastern Conference and the runaway leader of the West Conference?", then my answer would most likely have been "yes".  Also bear in mind, we have already played both matches against three of these teams - only the return Galaxy match remains on August 20th.

However, during this grueling part of the schedule we've picked up a number of injuries - Convey was absent for three of these games.  We've also been hampered by the suspensions of critical players during this demanding part of the schedule: Burling was missing for the Chivas game, and Lenhart for the Union game. A more positive reason we were shorthanded was Wondo's call up to the US men's national team.

Given the friendly nature of the West Brom game, I hope we can roll out some of the untested players and rest a few starters. Rafa Baca finally has the crucial immigration paperwork he needs to play; in the fifteen minutes he saw against the Union, the elevated crowd noise crowd noise he generated showed that the fans already anticipate much from him – fifteen minutes wasn’t much time to make an impact in his first outing.  The stalwarts of the reserve team: Morrow, Luzunaris, Ward, and Jasseh have yet to see any significant playing time in the first XI; the WBA game should be the perfect game to test their mettle.    


1 comment:

  1. Great post!

    I have wondered why do the Quakes lack firing. Are they afraid to have a forward, not a midfielder, that can do nothing but hit the back of the net? 

    When the Turkish-German striker came on trail, GM Doyle simply said this guy is just a goal scorer. So  is that a bad thing?

    Why are forwards like Ellis put in the wing when the kid has the hardest shot, with both legs, playing the wing while RJ, who hasn't scored in a year, is placed as the central forward?

    Lenhart is great at what he does, but he isn't giving much service when he does get the ball. Why is he partnered with slow Wondo? 

    Dawkins seems more comfortable behind the forwards, think Iniesta, but it has been shown, he doesn't do well as a forward up top. 

    My point is, repeatedly the same mistakes in the lineup are made with players playing in positions which they are not as useful. 

    ReplyDelete